Inori
FeaturesToolsPricing
Learn
GuidesStep-by-step tutorials and walkthroughs
GlossaryInsurance and compliance terminology
CompareSee how Inori compares to alternatives
Support
Help CenterFind answers and get support
ChangelogLatest updates and improvements
DemoSee Inori in action
Legal
PrivacyHow we handle your data
TermsTerms of service and usage
Blog
Sign InStart Free

Product

  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Tools
  • Demo

Resources

  • Help Center
  • Guides
  • Glossary
  • Compare

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Changelog
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • DPA
  • Security

© 2026 Inori Inc.

  1. Home
  2. /Glossary
  3. /Sale of Personal Information

Sale of Personal Information

Under CCPA/CPRA, any disclosure of personal information to a third party for monetary or other valuable consideration — a definition broad enough to sweep in targeted advertising, data cooperatives, and most analytics integrations absent a service-provider contract.

Overview

The "sale" of personal information is a legal term of art in US privacy law — not the everyday sense of a cash transaction. Under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), a "sale" is the selling, renting, releasing, disclosing, disseminating, making available, transferring, or otherwise communicating personal information to a third party for monetary or other valuable consideration.

"Other valuable consideration" is the hinge. It is what converts routine integrations — feeding data into an ad-tech pixel, contributing to a shared attribution graph, exchanging audience segments with a partner — into regulated sales that require opt-out notice and GPC honoring.

The CPRA added a parallel concept, "sharing for cross-context behavioral advertising," to close a loophole in the original CCPA where controllers argued that ad-tech data flows were not "sales" because no money changed hands. After CPRA, sharing for targeted advertising triggers the same opt-out regardless of whether consideration is exchanged.

When It Applies

A disclosure of personal information qualifies as a sale (or share) when all of the following are true:

  1. The data moves from the business to a third party (not a service provider under contract — see Controller vs Processor)
  2. Either monetary or other valuable consideration flows, or the data is used to deliver cross-context behavioral advertising
  3. The consumer has not directed the disclosure themselves (a user-initiated share is not a sale)

Typical examples that count as sales or shares:

  • Feeding personal identifiers into Meta, Google, or TikTok advertising pixels for retargeting
  • Contributing customer emails to a co-op or data cooperative in exchange for match rates
  • Allowing an analytics SDK to use event data for its own product improvement
  • Integrating a marketing automation tool that enriches the list from its own graph

Examples that typically are not sales:

  • Transferring data to a processor under a DPA that prohibits using the data for the processor's purposes
  • Sharing at the consumer's explicit direction (e.g., "connect my account to X")
  • Transferring data in a merger or acquisition (subject to notice requirements)

Variations Across Jurisdictions

JurisdictionDefinitionOpt-Out Right
California (CCPA/CPRA)Broad — "monetary or other valuable consideration"; "share" adds cross-context behavioral advertisingYes; Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information link required; GPC honored
Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oregon, TexasNarrower — usually "monetary consideration" only; targeted advertising is a separate opt-out rightYes; GPC honored
VirginiaMonetary consideration onlyYes; no GPC mandate
UtahMonetary consideration onlyYes; no GPC mandate
Florida, Kentucky, Iowa, Indiana, Tennessee, Rhode IslandMonetary consideration onlyYes; targeted-advertising opt-out separate
Nevada SB 220Narrow — restricted to "exchange for monetary consideration"Yes; website-specific right

California remains the strictest and most expansive definition. A data flow that is not a "sale" in Virginia may very well be a "sale or share" in California. Multi-state controllers typically configure their systems to treat the California posture as the baseline.

How Inori Handles This

Inori does not sell or share personal information under any statutory definition. The business model is subscription SaaS; there is no ad-tech, no data cooperative, no audience-enrichment flow.

Grounding in code:

  • No sale declaration — src/content/legal/privacy.mdx v1.2 contains an affirmative "We do not sell or share your personal information" statement that meets the CCPA notice-at-collection requirement.
  • GPC honored — middleware.ts:respectGpc detects the Sec-GPC: 1 header on every request and sets a server-side gpc_opt_out flag that disables any opt-out-sensitive behaviors for that consumer. This covers the 12 states where GPC is a mandatory universal opt-out mechanism per RIGHTS_AND_CONSENT.md Table 2.
  • Analytics opt-out — notification_preferences.analytics_opt_out is a per-consumer flag that disables Inori's own product analytics for that user, complementing GPC for tools that are not directly triggered by the header.
  • Processor discipline — every downstream vendor operates under a DPA with a no-sale clause (see DPA), preserving the processor classification and keeping those flows out of the sale/share definition entirely.
  • Subprocessor transparency — /legal/subprocessors discloses every recipient so consumers can independently verify the absence of ad-tech flows.

Related Concepts

The sale/share analysis turns entirely on the Controller vs Processor classification of the recipient. The opt-out mechanism consumers use to exercise the right is typically GPC for browser-based flows and a request form for others. The foundational law is CCPA/CPRA.

See how Inori handles sale of personal information

Try our free COI checker first, or start a free trial of the full platform.

Free COI CheckerStart Free Trial

Related Terms

Controller vs Processor

The legal distinction between the party that determines the purposes and means of processing personal data (controller) and the party that processes it on the controller's behalf (processor). Subprocessors sit one layer further down the chain.

Data Processing Agreement (DPA)

A contract required by every US state privacy law between a controller and any processor that handles personal data on its behalf, binding the processor to specific security, confidentiality, and subprocessor obligations.

GPC (Global Privacy Control)

A browser-level signal (Sec-GPC: 1 HTTP header) that communicates a user's preference to opt out of the sale or sharing of their personal information. Legally recognized as a valid opt-out mechanism under CCPA/CPRA.

CCPA / CPRA (California Consumer Privacy Act / California Privacy Rights Act)

California's comprehensive consumer privacy laws giving residents the right to know, delete, correct, and opt out of the sale or sharing of their personal information. CPRA amended and expanded CCPA effective January 1, 2023.